Why is 'pink' for girls and 'blue' for boys?
I am surrounded by friends who are all having babies and it seems that the only way to distinguish a boy from a girl newborn (other than seeing them naked) is that they're wearing either pink when they're girls and blue when they're boys. Why is that?
According to Wikipedia:
In 1918 "Infant's Department" (an industry publication) said the reverse was the "generally accepted rule", describing pink as "more decided and stronger" while blue was "more delicate and dainty"" Pink continued to be used for both boys' and girls' clothing through the early 1960s, though associated more and more with femininity.A more gruesome influence, it seems, was Nazi germany as the Nazis chose the color pink (with the triangle) to identify homosexual prisoners in concentration camps. This color was later re-claimed by homosexuals as a sign of defiance. It appears that pink was already associated with girls in Germany in the 1930s.
Aren't we glad times have changed?! Long live the new century.
2 Comments:
it also has to do with the air force wearing blue - which til then was the 'girls' colour
I learned quite recently that baby dressing custom used to be the exact reverse until a few centuries ago : blue = Virgin Mary = girl, red = sacred-heart of Jesus = boy.
But red became more feminine, and then of ill repute, so girls got stuck with the watered down version, the horrid baby-pink.
Pink for boys and blue for girls is still traditional in Belgium.
And I didn't know all that until I read the comments of this post at Langue sauce piquante (scroll down).
http://correcteurs.blog.lemonde.fr/correcteurs/2006/03/post_2.html
Post a Comment
<< Home