The tyranny of the intellectual
The topic was Islam in the US and France. The final participant, the only French person, brought up what she rightly acknowledged to be a controversial topic, namely the veil in the public school. In a strange echo to comments from another panel the preceding day, she embarked on a sharp rebuke of the Imams who impose their conservative worldview on the poor girls wearing the veils to school. When she pointed out that everyone seems to be talking about the 1,200 girls who wear the veil (some of them against their will), she was more intrigued by the other 200,000 girls who don't wear the veil and want a classroom free of religious symbolism and oppression. This was the big work - oppressed. These poor girls (on both sides of the figures) were "oppressed" by radical Imams.
This is not an argument that you would hear in the US, since American political and cultural debates focus more on rights than responsibilities. Freedom is a big deal on both sides of the Atlantic, but in the US it leans toward "freedom to" while in France it tends toward "freedom from." This particular French argument rests on the assumption that the French State has the responsbility to guarantee the rights and freedom from oppression of the 200,000 other girls (plus X# of the 1200 who don't really want to wear the veil - an assumed majority). In the US as long as the veil does not infringe on another's rights, narrowly defined, it is allowed.
What do they know about my decision to wear the veil, or any of us? They talk about oppression and wanting to free us from symbols of oppression. I find them oppressive. Maybe they are the ones oppressed, by a sexist culture. Shall I try to free her?
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home